Topical Interferon Gamma for Macular Edema Secondary to Uveitis (JakStat2)

September 6, 2012 updated by: Nida Sen, National Eye Institute (NEI)

The Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Uveitis Using Topical Interferon Gamma

The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of ocular instillations of interferon gamma-1b as a potential treatment for cystoid macular edema (CME) secondary to uveitis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Objective: Information gathered from NEI laboratories suggests that cystoid macular edema (CME) is caused by the disequilibrium of the JakStat and mTor signal transduction pathways in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). We wish to investigate whether stimulating the JakStat pathway with topically applied interferon gamma-1b can be a therapeutic intervention for the treatment of CME secondary to uveitis. The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of ocular instillations of interferon gamma-1b as a potential treatment for CME secondary to uveitis.

Study Population: Five participants with CME as evidenced by OCT (> 275 microns central macular thickness and/or loss of foveal contour) secondary to uveitis will receive topical ocular instillations of interferon gamma-1b. Up to seven participants may be enrolled in order to obtain the five participants to be included in the analysis if participants withdraw prior to receiving interferon gamma-1b.

Design: This Phase I/II, non-randomized, prospective, uncontrolled, single-center study will involve instilling four drops of interferon gamma-1b (approximately 30 μg) topically on the cornea of the study eye four times a day for one week and measuring the potential response with optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Outcome Measures: The primary outcome is the change in excess central macular thickening as measured by OCT in response to interferon gamma-1b. Treatment success is defined as a 25% decrease in excess central macular thickening at Week 1 as compared with baseline. Secondary efficacy outcomes include changes in macular volume as measured by OCT, visual acuity, intraocular pressure and intraocular inflammation as graded upon slit lamp examination. Secondary safety outcomes include ocular surface irritation assessed by fluorescein staining of the cornea and conjunctiva to assess toxicity, the number and severity of systemic and ocular toxicities, the number of adverse events and the proportion of participants with a visual loss of ≥ 15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Participant must be 18 years of age or older.
  2. Participant must understand and sign the protocol's informed consent document.
  3. Participant has a diagnosis of CME (central thickness of >275 microns on OCT and/or disruption of foveal contour) secondary to uveitis in at least one eye (the study eye).
  4. Participant is willing to comply with the study procedures and is expected to be able to return for all study visits.
  5. Participant has visual acuity of 20/400 or better in the study eye.
  6. Female participants of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breast-feeding.
  7. Both female participants of childbearing potential and male participants able to father a child must agree to practice two acceptable forms of contraception during the study and for six weeks following the last administration of investigational product. Acceptable methods of contraception include hormonal contraception (i.e., birth control pills, injected hormones dermal patch or vaginal ring), intrauterine device, barrier methods with spermicide (diaphragm with spermicide, condom with spermicide) or surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, tubal ligation or vasectomy).

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Participant is unable to tolerate the ocular instillations or follow study procedures.
  2. Participant has a significant active infection (an infection requiring treatment as determined by the medical team) that in the principal investigator's best medical judgment would preclude participation.
  3. Participant has multiple sclerosis (MS), as interferon gamma may cause MS exacerbations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interferon gamma-1b
Interferon gamma-1b (Actimmune®, InterMune, Inc, Brisbane, CA 94005) was supplied to participants in single-use dropperettes. Each dropperette contained approximately 0.2 mL of interferon gamma-1b (Actimmune®). Participants received 28 dropperettes at the baseline visit and were instructed to place four drops (approximately 7 μg per drop) topically on the cornea of the study eye four times per day for seven days.
Interferon gamma-1b (Actimmune®, InterMune, Inc, Brisbane, CA 94005) was supplied to participants in single-use dropperettes. Each dropperette contained approximately 0.2 mL of interferon gamma-1b (Actimmune®). Participants received 28 dropperettes at the baseline visit and were instructed to place four drops (approximately 7 μg per drop) topically on the cornea of the study eye four times per day for seven days.
Other Names:
  • Actimmune®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Week
Central macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue.
Baseline and 1 Week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Week
Central macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue.
Baseline and 1 Week
Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks
Central macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue.
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Change in Excess Central Macular Thickening in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks
Central macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue.
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Change in Macular Volume in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Week
Macular volume was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue.
Baseline and 1 Week
Change in Macular Volume in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week One Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Week
Macular volume was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue.
Baseline and 1 Week
Change in Macular Volume in the Study Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks
Macular volume was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue.
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Change in Macular Volume in the Fellow Eye, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at Week Two Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks
Macular volume was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue.
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Week
Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.
Baseline and 1 Week
Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Week
Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.
Baseline and 1 Week
Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks
Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Fellow Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks
Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Week
Intraocular pressure was recorded using a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer, a device for the measurement of intraocular pressure between 0 to 78 mm Hg.
Baseline and 1 Week
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Fellow Eye at Week One Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Week
Intraocular pressure was recorded using a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer, a device for the measurement of intraocular pressure between 0 to 78 mm Hg.
Baseline and 1 Week
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks
Intraocular pressure was recorded using a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer, a device for the measurement of intraocular pressure between 0 to 78 mm Hg.
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Fellow Eye at Week Two Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks
Intraocular pressure was recorded using a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer, a device for the measurement of intraocular pressure between 0 to 78 mm Hg.
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Proportion of Participants With a Visual Loss of 15 or More Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letters in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 Weeks
Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.
Baseline and 2 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hatice Nida Sen, MD, MHSc, National Eye Institute (NEI)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 8, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uveitis

Clinical Trials on Interferon Gamma-1b

3
Subscribe